Telecom Tax Blog

    The Five Best and Five Worst States for Starting a Telecom Solutions Provider Business

    Posted on Mon, Sep 16, 2013 @ 01:00 PM

    Are you thinking of becoming a solutions provider?  If so, what are the Five Best States for starting a technology business?  What are the Five Worst?

    CRN published an interesting article that looked at a broad range of criteria.  Here are the lists and brief explanations.  But, no matter where you start your business, SureTax can deliver your telecom tax solution, including VAT calculations for over 200 countries.

    Top Five

    #1 Utah.  Tech savvy and very pro-business.
    #2 Virginia.  Low taxes, limited regulations, sizable pool of educated workers and a virtually recession-proof economy.
    #3. Colorado
    #4. Washington
    #5. Maryland
     

    Bottom Five

    #50.  West Virginia.  Limited pool of IT educated workers and very limited business opportunities.
    #49.  Hawaii.  High labor costs and business expenses, taxes and regulatory environment, and business opportunity.
    #48. Wyoming
    #47. Arkansas
    #46. Mississippi

    Tags: telecom tax, voip tax, telecom taxes, telecommunications taxes, voip taxes, VAT tax, cloud computing

    Unified Communications Revenue Tops $2 Billion

    Posted on Mon, Feb 11, 2013 @ 06:33 PM

    Unified Communications services is a hot segment of the telecom market.

    New data from Synergy Research Group shows that annual service provider revenues from cloud UC services have now topped $2 billion. While today 75% of the cloud UC services market is for individual services – web conferencing, videoconferencing and contact center – the smaller UCaaS business suite market segment is growing more than twice as fast and will soon dominate.

    Today the UC standalone SaaS segment is dominated by Cisco, thanks to it having a 54% share of the web conferencing SaaS market – though its market share is edging downwards. The main challengers in UC standalone SaaS include Citrix, Microsoft, Adobe and Intercall, Meanwhile leaders in the higher growth UCaaS business suite segment are mainly up-and-coming new operators – including RingCentral, 8×8, ShoreTel/M5 and West IP Communications. It is notable that traditional telcos have not led the charge in either segment, though companies like AT&T, Verizon and BT are now becoming increasingly active.

    If you are thinking about getting into Unified Communications, SureTax® Telecom can handle any communications tax calculation, including Unified Communications.  With our partners, we can help new and existing providers with regulatory, calculation and compliance solutions.

    Tags: telecom tax, telecom taxes, telecommunications tax, ucaas

    Telecom Tax Avoidance and "Qui Tam"

    Posted on Wed, Jan 9, 2013 @ 11:11 AM

    At SureTax®, our services support telecom tax calculation for the purpose of compliance.  The notion being that if a company does not comply with tax laws, they are subject to fines and penalties.

    But, what if a company cheats - doesn’t pay taxes - and is caught by a whistleblower?  Then what happens?

    There is a provision in common law call called qui tam, which is short for the Latin phrase qui tam pro domino rege quam pro se ipso in hac parte sequitu, meaning ‘he who sues in this matter for the king as for himself’.  It’s a principle that is still alive in US law and it means that whistleblowers can earn some or all of the collections of a case presented on behalf of the government.

    Earlier this year, a whistleblower brought a qui tam case in New York under the state’s False Claims ActNew York attorney general Eric Schneiderman intervened in that case against a national wireless provider for deliberately under-collecting and under-paying $100 million dollars in sales taxes on wireless access plans.

    But, what about the federal tax?  Why not bring a qui tam case there also?

    A loophole in federal law prohibits whistleblowers from bringing qui tam cases.  The IRS has a whistleblower office, where whistleblowers can go to file a complaint.  But, if the IRS decides not to take the case, it’s over and the whistleblower has no qui tam option.

    In New York, the defendant must have at least $1 million in sales and must have deprived the state of at least $350,000 in revenue.

    Maybe Congress needs to take a look at New York to figure out how to increase collections.  A federal qui tam law could do for tax fraud what nickel return deposits did for aluminum can recycling.

     

    Tags: telecom tax, voip tax, telecom taxes, telecommunications taxes, telecommunications tax, ucaas, tax calculation, voip taxes, VAT tax

    VoIP Tax implications as International Internet Tax Discussions Start Monday.

    Posted on Fri, Nov 30, 2012 @ 08:04 PM

    As providers of telecom tax and VoIP tax solutions, we are interested in anything that may change the commercial dynamics of the internet.

    We are looking with great interest at the upcoming meeting of the International Telecommunications Union, beginning December 3 in Dubai.  Today, we take the internet and the free flow of information for granted.  But, for countries around the world, the internet has changed the balance of power and the revenue streams.

    VoIP has displaced landline service around the world, leaving poorer nations to look for new streams of revenue.  The free flow of information has also displaced local media and put governments at risk.  So, this meeting should be interesting, as the governments of less developed countries look to gain more revenue and control, while more developed countries hope to maintain the internet as it is with a "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" approach.

    Amongst the players, the United States is aligned with Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico and others as preferring to keep the internet as it is now. As well as having support from African countries, officials say Russia has backing for some of its proposals from China.

    With over half of world owning smart phones, this is perhaps the most under reported story in the world.  We watch and hope that the internet remains the engine of commerce and prosperity that is has been for the last 20 years.

    Tags: telecom tax, voip tax, telecom taxes, voip taxes

    VoIP Tax Change in Wisconsin

    Posted on Tue, Oct 30, 2012 @ 01:55 PM

    Do you sell VoIP Services throughout the US?  If so, make sure you know the state by state taxability statutes.  One example of a change in policy from Wisconsin:  "Changes to the Taxability Status of Nomadic VOIP Service for Purposes of the Wisconsin Universal Service Fund".

    As a result of the same legislation that restricted the definition of the term telecommunications service to now exclude revenue derived from the sale of data and information services from WI USF assessment liability, VOIP providers are now equally required to contribute to the fund. To quote the text of the key statutory provision as a result of being amended by Senate Bill 13:

    “Contributions under this paragraph may be based only on the gross operating revenues from  the provision of broadcast services identified by the commission under subd. 2. and on intrastate telecommunications services in this state of the telecommunications providers subject to the contribution. Contributions based on revenues from interconnected voice over Internet protocol service shall be calculated as provided under s. 196.206(2)(b).”[1]

    “An entity that provides interconnected voice over Internet protocol service in this state shall make contributions to the universal service fund based on its revenues from providing intrastate interconnected voice over Internet protocol service. The revenues shall be calculated using the entity’s actual intrastate revenues, a provider-specific traffic study approved by the commission or federal communications commission, or the inverse of the interstate jurisdictional allocation established by the federal communications commission for the purpose of federal universal service assessments.”[2]

    Why spend your days managing this type of minutia?  As part of SureTax® Telecom, every rate and rule change is automatically updated and release notes are sent to you for your records.



    [1] Wisconsin Statutes § 196.218(3)(a)3m.

    [2] Wisconsin Statutes § 196.206(2).


    Tags: telecom tax, voip tax, telecom taxes, voip taxes

    VoIP Tax, VoIP Revenue and Telephone Numbers

    Posted on Tue, Oct 30, 2012 @ 12:29 PM

    At SureTax®, we're focused on telecom and VoIP tax calculation.  But, we can't help but be amazed at the transformation that the VoIP providers are bringing to the world and the affect that has on our phone numbers.

    It wasn't long ago that 96%+ of American households had a landline phone. In fact, if you didn't have a phone number, you almost couldn't get credit.  A phone number was that important.  It was part of your identity, like your name or address.  In fact, all the names and addresses and phone numbers were published in a big book that came out once a year.  (I throw that it because some kids have never seen a phone book).

    So, what's your phone number? Do you need one? How do you commercialize the connection between communication, technology and identity?

    At one time, your phone number was hard coded to your phone.  It was the physical location of your circuit and the place where your connection to the caller was made.  Now, it's just a number that represents a virtual location, much the same as a domain name reflects a DNS server address. 

    So, as VoIP replaces the Public Switch Telephone Network, what happens to our numbers?  The notion of "your phone number" is changing and causing ripple effects throughout  the economy.  It's affecting how pollsters project elections, how researchers learn about new product acceptance and how neighbors contact neighbors.

    As telecom revenues decline, could phone numbers represent a new opportunity?  After all, the technology may have changed, but our need to project an identity has not.

    Research body Ovum, part of the Datamonitor group, has revealed the results of a new study that show there is due to be a significant impact on telecommunications providers over the coming years as a direct result of the rise of VoIP.  Jeremy Green, principal telecoms strategy analyst at Ovum, said the primary threat to the market is that VoIP has the potential to reduce people's commitment to a certain telephone number.

    "Operators should use telephone numbers as the identifier and address for cloud-based services, allow customers to choose numbers that are relevant to them and develop more application-to-person SMS applications," he suggested.

    The report explained that revenue in the market is falling, but rather than voice traffic reducing it is simply switching to new platforms. Ovum said it is confident that turning people's reliance towards VoIP apps and the latest technology can ensure operators have a healthy future.

    Some providers are said to have taken a pessimistic view of the future and have opted to compete on price in a bid to eke out what they believe will be the last of significant revenues from the telecommunications market. But they have arguably made a mistake, as it is claimed by Mr. Green that many "commercial realities and opportunities" lie in the VoIP sector and are waiting to be realized.

    I wonder what Mr. Green knew about Facebook adding VoIP integration? it will be interesting to see how VoIP, voice and phone numbers re-connect to our identities.

     

       

     

     

    Tags: telecom tax, voip tax, telecom taxes, voip taxes

    Three Common Mistakes Made By VoIP Providers. Part 3 of 3.

    Posted on Mon, Oct 1, 2012 @ 05:01 PM

    Mistake #3: Not representing the proper taxes and fees on the bill.

    The VoIP world got off to a crazy start with offers flying all over the country for unlimited service for a low flat monthly fee. All the service providers were taking the stance that “hey, its internet, it isn’t taxable” so needless to say thousands of new companies were launched with little to no regard for taxation compliance.

    As always, the regulatory agencies were slow to catch up, but as they always do when tax dollars are on the table, they caught up.  Now VoIP providers all over the country are scrambling to understand the tax they should and should not collect based on the type of service they are and how it is billed and delivered.

    However,  while many are catching on that tax is something they should be collecting, the question becomes what taxes?  Along with that question is how do I represent those taxes on the bill?

    As Talk America discovered in 2006, not properly representing the taxes on the bill can be as bad as not collecting them at all.  The FTC is extremely diligent in protecting consumers from what they perceive as being false or misleading statements.

    So what do we do?  Well here is a quick reference list of some things you need to be sure you get right:

    • Understand the difference between provider based taxes, and consumer based taxes. 
    • Understand which of these taxes are pass-through taxes, which are not pass-through taxes and which are optional to be passed through to the consumer.
    • Make sure that you call a fee a fee and not a tax.
    • Make sure you call a surcharge a surcharge and not a tax. 
    • Make sure that you write out the exact nomenclature that the taxing authority expects to see.  Abbreviations or modifications to the bill can cause you problems.

    Nothing prevents a carrier or service provider from charging to recover costs or overhead, but improperly implying that those fees are somehow mandated by the government will get you in more trouble than it is worth.

    Click me

     

    Click me

    Click me

     

    Tags: telecom tax, voip tax, telecom taxes, voip taxes

    US Suppliers of Digital Services being Targeted by UK for VAT Tax

    Posted on Fri, Sep 14, 2012 @ 11:08 AM

    Are you selling digital goods and services in the EU?

    We've heard that the UK is targeting US digital services sellers to ensure VAT compliance.  All companies outside of the European Union (like the United States) are required to register, collect and remit VAT tax.

    By digital services, we mean:

    • Software downloads
    • Content like digital music, games and video
    • Online images, databases and information
    • Webhosting
    • Cloud computing
    • eBooks
    • Website subscriptions
    SureTax® provides tax calculation solutions for digital services in the EU.  We can help with your EU tax calculation and compliance needs.

    contactUs_suretax

    Tags: telecom tax, telecom taxes, VAT tax, cloud computing, digital goods, digital services

    iPhone 5 to Give US GDP a Bounce

    Posted on Tue, Sep 11, 2012 @ 01:46 PM

    We do telecom tax and voip tax solutions, but we can't help but follow the amazing transformation of worldwide mobile communications.  That transformation is driven by the most amazing business transformation ever, that of Apple computer from a niche computer player to the worldwide mobile computing design and innovation leader.

    Who knew?

    Looks like the iPhone5 will give the US GDP a bounce, maybe as much as a half a point.  Take a moment to consider everything that goes into the US GDP.  A half of a point is incredible and speaks to the world’s appetite for mobile computing.

    It’s also expected that the iPhone5 will affect PC sales, include Dell.  (I bet once a quarter, some reporter asks Michael Dell about his famous advice to Steve Jobs that said that Apple should give the shareholders their money back).

    Here’s more on iPhone and GDP.

    A research note released by J.P. Morgan on Monday estimated that sales of Apple's next-generation iPhone may add between one quarter and one half a percentage point to fourth quarter annualized U.S. gross domestic product growth in 2012.

    According to the firm's chief U.S. economist Michael Feroli, estimated domestic sales of the so-called iPhone 5 will be about 8 million units in quarter four, not including purchases of carry-over phones like the iPhone 4S.

    Feroli goes through the calculations that arrived at the relatively large GDP contribution: by finding the difference between an assigned retail price of $600 per handset, similar to past launches, and an imported cost component of $200 per phone, a $400 per iPhone trade margin can be applied to the GDP.

    "Thus, calculated using the so-called retail control method, sales of iPhone 5 could boost Q4 GDP by $3.2 billion, or $12.8 billion at an annual rate," Feroli writes. "This would boost annualized GDP growth in Q4 by 0.33%-point."

     The economist goes on to note that while out-of-pocket prices may be lower due to carrier subsidies, usually about $350 per device, companies that sell the phone often report sales based on stand-alone prices.
      

    Tags: telecom tax, voip taxes

    Today's Telecom Tax Could be Tomorrow's Internet Tax

    Posted on Mon, Aug 27, 2012 @ 01:42 PM

    As followers of all things telecom tax and internet tax, we remain interested in how changes in the American telecom infrastructure become changes in our taxes, which in turn becomes changes in the types of tax that SureTax® calculates.  So, it seems logical that today's USF becomes tomorrows Universal Internet Fund.  After all, taxing communications is as American as apple pie.  But, an Internet USF Tax is not a sure thing.

    USF goes back to communications being a fundamental enabler of democracy and commerce.  From the beginning, the founders of this country envisioned a nation that was connected with communications infrastructure. The postal service connected Americans with each other (and their bill collectors!). It was subsidized using a flat fee system, so the inexpensive letters carried across town helped pay for the letters sent across the country.  The Communications Act of 1934 continued in that spirit, envisioning a system for "a rapid, efficient, nationwide, and worldwide wire and radio communication...for ALL of the people of the United States."  That notion led to the Universal Services Fund (USF).

    As telecom continues to go digital, the FCC wants to implement a new fee similar to USF, to enable broadband access to all across the country.  It makes sense that a community without broadband today would be as disadvantaged as a community without dial tone before the days of the internet.

    So, here comes the Internet USF Tax.  Seems like a done deal.  Some customers pay a little every month so that the people with difficult economics can also benefit from service.  Simple.

    No, not simple!

    In 1998, Congress passed the Internet Fairness Act, prohibiting taxation of internet access!  So, no tax.  But, wait.... is USF a tax?  The FCC says it isn't.  They say it's a fee collected by carriers.  So, if USF is simply a fee, then an Internet USF would be legal.

    Who knows what will happen?  I do know that whenever they sort this out, we'll be ready to make the calculations that keep everyone in compliance.

    You can read more here....

    http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/245479-fcc-eyes-tax-on-internet-service.

     

    suretax whitepaper cta

     

     

     

     

    http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/245479-fcc-eyes-tax-on-internet-service

    Tags: telecom tax, voip tax, i-voip tax, i-voip taxes, telecom taxes, telecommunications tax, voip taxes

    Schedule a Demo

    Featured Whitepaper

    SureTax Webinar

    SureTax Telecom Tax VoIP Tax Questions

    SureTax Telecom Tax