Telecom Tax Blog

    iPhone 5 to Give US GDP a Bounce

    Posted on Tue, Sep 11, 2012 @ 01:46 PM

    We do telecom tax and voip tax solutions, but we can't help but follow the amazing transformation of worldwide mobile communications.  That transformation is driven by the most amazing business transformation ever, that of Apple computer from a niche computer player to the worldwide mobile computing design and innovation leader.

    Who knew?

    Looks like the iPhone5 will give the US GDP a bounce, maybe as much as a half a point.  Take a moment to consider everything that goes into the US GDP.  A half of a point is incredible and speaks to the world’s appetite for mobile computing.

    It’s also expected that the iPhone5 will affect PC sales, include Dell.  (I bet once a quarter, some reporter asks Michael Dell about his famous advice to Steve Jobs that said that Apple should give the shareholders their money back).

    Here’s more on iPhone and GDP.

    A research note released by J.P. Morgan on Monday estimated that sales of Apple's next-generation iPhone may add between one quarter and one half a percentage point to fourth quarter annualized U.S. gross domestic product growth in 2012.

    According to the firm's chief U.S. economist Michael Feroli, estimated domestic sales of the so-called iPhone 5 will be about 8 million units in quarter four, not including purchases of carry-over phones like the iPhone 4S.

    Feroli goes through the calculations that arrived at the relatively large GDP contribution: by finding the difference between an assigned retail price of $600 per handset, similar to past launches, and an imported cost component of $200 per phone, a $400 per iPhone trade margin can be applied to the GDP.

    "Thus, calculated using the so-called retail control method, sales of iPhone 5 could boost Q4 GDP by $3.2 billion, or $12.8 billion at an annual rate," Feroli writes. "This would boost annualized GDP growth in Q4 by 0.33%-point."

     The economist goes on to note that while out-of-pocket prices may be lower due to carrier subsidies, usually about $350 per device, companies that sell the phone often report sales based on stand-alone prices.
      

    Tags: telecom tax, voip taxes

    Smartphones for Everyone

    Posted on Mon, Sep 10, 2012 @ 09:42 AM

    As we at SureTax® focus on telecom tax and VoIP tax, we can’t help but a little distracted by the new hardware.  The new Kindles have just been released (not a smartphone, but 3G and 4G enabled) and the new iPhone 5 debuts tomorrow.

    So, how is the handset market?  Handset shipments had grown at a compounded annual growth rate of over 15% between 2009-2011.  Over 2 billion handsets will be shipped in 2015.  The primary driver of demand has been new smartphones, like the iPhone and Droid phones.  Even in the most remote corners of the planet, it’s not enough just to talk any more.

    Worldwide, global mobile penetration is 91%.  The implications of bringing mobile communications and data access to everyone on the planet are astounding.  

    Smartphones have driven that penetration, taking Western Europe and North America to OVER 100% in some markets.  Asia Pacific and Africa are still growing at over 9% per year.

    What does that mean in terms of opportunity?  As subscriber growth mirrors population growth, the opportunity is in the replacement handset market and providing services to the users on the platform.  Give some thought as to what services could be provided if everyone in the world had a smartphone.  By “if”, we mean “when” because that day is coming.

    While you do that, we’ll think about who’s going to impose the telecom taxes and how we’ll provide the tax calculation piece of the equation.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Tags: voip tax, telecom taxes, telecommunications taxes, telecommunications tax, voip taxes

    Today's Telecom Tax Could be Tomorrow's Internet Tax

    Posted on Mon, Aug 27, 2012 @ 01:42 PM

    As followers of all things telecom tax and internet tax, we remain interested in how changes in the American telecom infrastructure become changes in our taxes, which in turn becomes changes in the types of tax that SureTax® calculates.  So, it seems logical that today's USF becomes tomorrows Universal Internet Fund.  After all, taxing communications is as American as apple pie.  But, an Internet USF Tax is not a sure thing.

    USF goes back to communications being a fundamental enabler of democracy and commerce.  From the beginning, the founders of this country envisioned a nation that was connected with communications infrastructure. The postal service connected Americans with each other (and their bill collectors!). It was subsidized using a flat fee system, so the inexpensive letters carried across town helped pay for the letters sent across the country.  The Communications Act of 1934 continued in that spirit, envisioning a system for "a rapid, efficient, nationwide, and worldwide wire and radio communication...for ALL of the people of the United States."  That notion led to the Universal Services Fund (USF).

    As telecom continues to go digital, the FCC wants to implement a new fee similar to USF, to enable broadband access to all across the country.  It makes sense that a community without broadband today would be as disadvantaged as a community without dial tone before the days of the internet.

    So, here comes the Internet USF Tax.  Seems like a done deal.  Some customers pay a little every month so that the people with difficult economics can also benefit from service.  Simple.

    No, not simple!

    In 1998, Congress passed the Internet Fairness Act, prohibiting taxation of internet access!  So, no tax.  But, wait.... is USF a tax?  The FCC says it isn't.  They say it's a fee collected by carriers.  So, if USF is simply a fee, then an Internet USF would be legal.

    Who knows what will happen?  I do know that whenever they sort this out, we'll be ready to make the calculations that keep everyone in compliance.

    You can read more here....

    http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/245479-fcc-eyes-tax-on-internet-service.

     

    suretax whitepaper cta

     

     

     

     

    http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/245479-fcc-eyes-tax-on-internet-service

    Tags: telecom tax, voip tax, i-voip tax, i-voip taxes, telecom taxes, telecommunications tax, voip taxes

    MetroPCS goes VoIP

    Posted on Fri, Aug 17, 2012 @ 03:28 PM

    As we follow telecom tax and voip tax changes, we follow the industry also.  So, it's interesting to note that MetroPCS has introduced America's first voice-over-LTE service, combining its voice, messaging and Internet services onto a single IP network.

    That seems like quite a technology advance for the carrier that traditionally is know for offering value priced services in metro areas.  Then again, VoIP began in the consumer market as a value driven offer, offering customers POTS like service at a less than POTS price.

    MetroPCS was driven to innovate by the need for more efficient use of spectrum.  Their 2G CDMA and 4G LTE service are on the same spectrum, so moving voice over to the IP network uses spectrum more efficiently.  In wireless, it's all about spectrum.

    There is a tax implication to the change.  Voice and data can be taxed differently.  A flexible tax calculation engine, like SureTax Telecom, can handle that change with ease.

    To read more about MetroPCS and their single IP service, see http://gigaom.com/mobile/metropcs-enters-the-voip-age-who-will-be-next/.

    You can read more about SureTax Telecom here.

     

    Tags: telecom tax, voip tax, i-voip tax, telecommunications tax, voip taxes

    PSTN ends on 2018, at least that's the plan

    Posted on Tue, Aug 7, 2012 @ 11:01 AM

    As VoIP tax and telecom tax service providers, we find telecom to be fascinating.  It seems not that long ago when 96%+ of all Americans had a landline telephone.  In fact, if you DIDN'T have a landline phone, it was a sign that something was wrong.  It was tough to get a loan without a landline phone.

    Here are amazing stats presented by the Technology Advisory Council to the FCC.

    - By 2014, the United States will have fewer than 42M access lines

    - Access line losses were nearly 6.6 million between 2Q09 and 2Q10, a drop of 7.3%.

    - By 2014 US consumers will have 31.6 million VoIP lines accounting for 42.5% of all U.S. access lines

    - Fixed lines continue to decline; mobile is the preferred choice for voice communication

    - More than 25% of U.S. consumers aged 18 or older have already given up their voice landline for voice wireless‐only service.

    The biggest stat of all is that by 2018, only 6% of Americans are expected to have traditional landline service.  So, 2018 is expected to be the last year of the PSTN (and its tax revenue).

    Perhaps the supreme irony is that in the early days of the internet, families would get a second phone line for their modems.  Phone companies (even the term "phone company" seems archaic) saw PSTN line growth exploded.  That same desire for digital and mobile communication is leading the PSTN's demise.

    There's a moral in there somewhere....

     

    Tags: voip tax, i-voip tax, i-voip taxes, telecommunications taxes, telecommunications tax, voip taxes

    15 Amazing Worldwide Mobile Facts

    Posted on Fri, Aug 3, 2012 @ 05:33 PM

    As professionals committed to VoIP tax and telecom tax solutions, we are often amazed at how large the market for telecom truly is.  It is the one product that everyone, and I mean EVERYONE, seems to need.

     We recently received an industry report with 15 facts that quantify exactly how large this market is.  Here are three that are just amazing…

    • The global population is currently estimated at 7 billion.
    • There will be 6.5 billion mobile subscribers worldwide by end-2012
    • The worldwide mobile subscriber base will now grow at a CAGR of 7.3 percent between 2011 and 2016, to near 8.5 billion by end-2016

    It’s no wonder that worldwide; telecom is the service that jurisdictions love to tax.  With 6.5 billion units in service, just one dollar per subscriber per month would yield almost $80B in revenue worldwide.

    The other 12 facts are almost as amazing.  Plus, you can use them to impress your friends at work.

    Click here to download the 15 Worldwide Mobile Facts.

     

    Tags: voip tax, i-voip tax, i-voip taxes, telecom taxes, voip taxes

    Technology and Cloud Computing - Ahead of Regulation

    Posted on Mon, Jul 23, 2012 @ 09:14 AM

    At SureTax, we deliver Sales Tax solutions through the cloud, so we're always interested in what's going on with cloud computing and regulation.  Also, as developers, we like to think that we stay ahead of the curve.  So, this recent article caught our eye, once again proving that technology always seems to stay at least a step ahead of regulation.

    On July 10th, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council issued a four page report In explains how banking institutions should apply existing guidance to deals they sign for outsourced cloud based deals.

    Four pages?  That seems a bit thin.  Is that disappointing?  Sure.  Is it surprising?  No.

    No one should be surprised that regulators are a bit behind the curve in their understanding of cloud computing issues.  From steam engines to mobile phones to high speed internet, regulators have been behind the curve.  

    Why?  Guidance on new technology matters tends to trickle up from practitioners, not down from regulators.

    Francoise Gilbert, an attorney at the IT LAW GROUP says the FFIEC report is far too shallow to offer banks and credit unions any real insights about precautions they should take when considering cloud computing.

    The FFIEC suggests that when considering cloud computing, banks and credit unions continue to follow the same fundamental guidelines and risk strategies outlined in the FFIEC Information Technology Examination Handbook, especially the Outsourcing Technology Services Booklet.  

    That's interesting, but not insightful.  Cloud computing has issues beyond just outsourced technology. 

    Give it time.  The regulators will collect data, sort out what's happening in practice and will provide useful guidelines.  It will just take a while.

    Read more about the matter here.  

     

     

    Tags: cloud computing

    3 Taxation Mistakes that VoIP Providers Make - Part 2

    Posted on Tue, Jul 17, 2012 @ 01:05 PM

    Last post, we covered Mistake #1 - Not understanding what regulatory variation of VoIP you were providing.

    Mistake #2 is to not understand the concept of telecom tax-on-tax.

    Tax-on-tax is a difficult topic.  Tax-on-tax represents a process by which telecommunications providers must factor the additional dollar amount attributable to either the same tax or a different tax invoiced to consumers into their adjusted tax remittance calculations.

    Historically, tax literature has traditionally been silent regarding the rules & system of application to calculate tax-on-tax.  Nevertheless, as a matter of practice, tax authorities require vendors to include tax amounts collected from subscribers within the tax base of a given tax.  Consequently, tax managers need to develop an effective methodology to determine (A) when tax-on-tax applies and (B) how to calculate the amount of tax actually owed to the government.  If a company doesn’t understand all of the nuances associated with factoring tax on tax correctly, the company will wind up paying tax on the amount of the tax passed-through to the consumer - even if this extra increment of tax is NOT collected from the consumer!

    For example, the pass-through amount appearing on a consumer's invoice must be included in the amount of Total Taxable Revenue reported to the taxing authority on the company's tax return.  If a company charges the consumer only the initial sum resulting from the 1st calculation of tax on the service, it will fail to collect the entire amount of tax owed to the taxing authority. In some states, such as New York, this could cost a provider as much as 1% in lost revenue. 

    The company must calculate a “grossed-up” tax rate in order to assure that the amount of tax collected and the amount of tax owed are the same.

    So, what factors do tax managers need to consider in order to determine whether tax-on-tax applies and what taxes may/must be included in the base? 

    The first step is to determine the following:

    1. Does any statutory exclusion exist for tax-on-tax?

    2. Incidence of the tax. Is the tax (A) Consumer-Based or (B) Provider-Based?  As a general rule, consumer-based taxes will be excluded from the tax base of other gross receipts-based taxes, while as a general rule provider-based taxes featuring an optional pass-through rule will be included within their own tax base as well as in the tax base of other gross receipts-based taxes.  However, these are just general and not always the case such as in Pennsylvania where they ruled that disputed taxes and surcharges are a “cost of doing business” that a telco is only allowed to recover from customers pursuant to state PUC regulations and tariffs.

    3. Tax Base Measurement – Is the tax levied as: (A) a Flat Fee or (B) a Percentage of Gross Receipts?  Assessments imposed in the form of “flat fees” will exclude other taxes from their own tax base

    4. Pass-Through Rules – Is the pass-through of the tax:

    5. (A) Prohibited, (B) Optional, or (C) Required? Taxes with a prohibited pass-through rule will generally be excluded from the tax base of other gross receipts-based taxes.

    Next determine if the states in which you operate are part of the Streamlined Sales Tax Project (SSTP).

    The Streamlined Sales Tax Project (SSTP) adopted official policies regarding tax-on-tax.  In both the Agreement itself (SSUTA) and the accompanying “Rules & Procedures” (which interpret the actual text of the Agreement), specific provisions have been adopted informing:

    1. Taxpayers when tax-on-tax needs to be collected 

    2. Taxing authorities as to the situations where laws or regulations may be enacted to replace the default guidelines with a customized set of rules, as well as the conditions that must be satisfied in order to implement such state-specific policy “overrides”.

    To know what these host of conditions are and what states apply them, download our presentation on our website entitled “Tax-On-Tax: Hall of Mirrors”.

    What about Federal Taxes?  Do I include those in the base?

    The general rules concerning federal Taxes are:

    1. Any federal tax that is directly imposed upon a consumer (based upon the same set of rules governing state or local taxes) are excluded from “sales price” when separately stated on the invoice given to the consumer.       Example:  Federal Excise Tax on Communications (FET)

    2. Federal taxes/surcharges that are imposed upon the seller or treated as a “cost of doing business” to the seller are included within the sales price, regardless of whether such taxes are separately stated on the consumer invoice.  Example:  Federal Universal Service Fund (FUSF) Surcharge

    [Streamlined Sales Tax Rules and Procedures – Rule 327.9]

    Again, these are just general rules and are not necessarily the rules that every state applies.  In order to properly calculate tax-on-tax you must know how each state you do business in treats things like franchise fees, FET, Right of Way fees, and e911 fees as they relate to gross receipts for the purpose of taxation.

    If you feel confused or overwhelmed, don’t feel bad.  This certainly isn’t “the flat tax”.  The topic is confusing and overwhelming.  But, if you are a VoIP provider, you have a duty to collect and remit taxes no matter how difficult the process. 

    Coming soon...  Mistake #3.

    Tags: telecom tax, voip tax, telecom taxes, telecommunications taxes, telecommunications tax, voip taxes

    3 Taxation Mistakes that VoIP Providers Make - Part 1

    Posted on Thu, Jun 28, 2012 @ 12:53 PM

    So, you’re a VoIP operator trying to figure out your VoIP taxes.  Confusing, isn’t it?

    It’s so confusing that many new operators decide that calculating telecom tax is just too complex (our VoIP whitepaper can help).  Some implement the “Ostrich Strategy” and stick their head in the sand - figuring that they will pay their tax once they get “big enough”.  Other operators rely on best guesses or tax advice from their general accountants and attorneys.  Either choice can be disastrous, leading to audits from any number of federal and state agencies that can put their VoIP start-up on the road to destruction before it even gains traction.

    Let me help you sort through the VoIP tax confusion.  Let’s start with the beginning.

    VoIP tax was born in 2004.  As the FCC attempted to shore up the Universal Service Fund,  it created the “IP-in–the-Middle” Order.  In that order, the Commission ruled that VoIP is a telecommunications service and thus subject to USF obligations if it is “an interexchange service that: (1) uses ordinary customer premises equipment with no enhanced functionality; (2) originates and terminates on the public switched telephone network (PSTN); and (3) undergoes no net protocol conversion and provides no enhanced functionality to end users due to the provider’s use of IP technology”. 

    Next, regulated VoIP was defined in 2005.  The FCC created a new category of regulated communications service called I-VoIP (Interconnected Voice over Internet Protocol.  I-VoIP is the standard that the legal community uses to decide which VoIP services are regulated).  The FCC defines I-VoIP with four major characteristics, and a provider must possess all four of these characteristics or it is not I-VOIP, but perhaps a VoIP Toll.  (For a detailed understanding of these characteristics, please download our VoIP whitepaper).

    Suppose you checked your VoIP offering versus the FCC’s  four characteristics and you’ve determined that you are regulated.  Now you need to figure out what "flavor" of VoIP you are offering.  

    While the FCC has defined two categories of VoIP (I-VoIP and VoIP Toll), there are still different flavors of VoIP within these categories - such as Fixed and Nomadic VoIP (details are included in the VoIP whitepaper) - and each flavor carries with it even more nuances. 

    These flavors are important.  Each VoIP nuance carries significance not only at the federal level, but also at the state level because taxation and regulation vary so much from state to state.  Some states limit their regulatory powers to E-911 and Public Safety, while others regulate through their Department of Revenue and other state taxing authorities.  The taxes that they may assess include:

    • State and Local Sales and Use Tax
    • Excise Tax
    • Gross receipts tax
    • Utility Users Tax
    • E-911 (both State and Local)
    • Local Telecommunications taxes

    If you are an I-VoIP; you must also file a Form 499-A (at a minimum), which reports your revenue data for the calculation of obligations to:

    • Federal USF
    • Federal TRS (Relay) Fund
    • North American Numbering Plan Administration
    • Shared costs of local number portability
    • FCC Regulatory Fees

    Still confused?  It’s understandable.  It’s a complex subject.

    What next?  The first step is to download our VoIP whitepaper.  Then, watch for our next two installments of this blog.  The whitepaper and blog articles will help you sort this out.   Until then, figure out what flavor of VoIP you offer. Here are some questions you should answer:

    1. Is the service fixed or nomadic?
    2. Is the service associated with static IP address or is it “over the top”?
    3. How do I source the fees, by jurisdiction of the calls or billing address?
    4. How do I represent these taxes properly to comply with Truth-in Billing?  (Hint: see blog post #3 in this series).

    If you need more immediate help, contact me.  I’m glad to talk you through issues and share my expert contacts with you.  

    Until then...stay tuned for Part Two – Tax-on-Tax..

    Click me

     

    Tags: telecom tax, voip tax, i-voip tax, i-voip taxes, telecom taxes, telecommunications taxes, telecommunications tax, voip taxes

    The EU, VoIP Tax and Net Neutrality

    Posted on Thu, Jun 28, 2012 @ 08:47 AM

    Telecommunications, by it's very nature, is perhaps the most international of all services.  So, as I follow the internet tax/telecom tax/VoIP tax issue, I found this article from Europe to be interesting.

    Europe's main telecommunications operator's association (ENTO) said it is not asking the UN to impose internet taxes on content providers.  Rather the ENTO wants telecommunications network operators to consider commercial deals with the content giants.  ENTO would prefer to offer commerical arrangements where partners get a preferred/priority level of service.  

    That sounds very profitable for them.  ENTO is smart.  Why charge a tax, when you could charge a fee that affects the competitive nature of the game and has some upside?  

    Telecom tax, VoIP tax, internet tax and the global future of internet policy is being decided right now.

    ETNO's proposal was submitted as a topic for debate at the UN's International Telecommunication Union (ITU) in December.

    You can read more about it here:

    http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/257223/eu_carriers_were_not_asking_the_un_for_internet_taxes.html

    Tags: telecom tax, voip tax

    Schedule a Demo

    Featured Whitepaper

    SureTax Webinar

    SureTax Telecom Tax VoIP Tax Questions

    SureTax Telecom Tax